
Medicine is evolving at lightning speed. Every month brings new treatment methods, digital tools, updated protocols, and cutting-edge AI solutions. But this rapid progress raises a key question: how can we objectively assess the effectiveness of medical care? What should our doctors do to make patient care even better?
Modern clinical practice faces several challenges:
- Lack of comprehensive analytics on treatment effectiveness
- Difficulty measuring outcomes that matter most to patients (quality of life, functionality, long-term effects)
- Insufficient evidence base for implementing new protocols or changing therapy approaches
- A gap between clinical decisions and actual results
In response to these calls, an increasing number of clinics decided to implement complex clinical outcomes solutions. These tools are far more than just another “data collector”, since they help you analyze and use treatment outcome data to make patient care even better.
What are Clinical Outcomes Solutions (COS) and Why Do You Need Them
These are digital tools that help healthcare organizations track, analyze, and improve patient outcomes. In other words, these systems enable clinicians and administrators to assess the real-world impact of patient care, including the efficiency of prescribed medication and the improvement in the client’s life. Such solutions help clinics:
- Make evidence-based decisions.
- Evaluate the patient’s overall quality of life.
- Introduce new, evidence-based treatment protocols.
- Optimize resources by avoiding ineffective or overly expensive methods.
You can easily integrate patient outcomes solutions with existing electronic health records (EHR), lab systems, monitoring devices, or patient apps. That way, your system will automatically collect data from various sources and present clear, actionable metrics to clinicians. So, your team will be able to identify concentration patterns beforehand.
Reporting ≠ Analytics: What’s the Difference?
You may respond to us with “Hey, we’ve already had a reporting tool, so isn’t the clinical solutions consultant simply doubling it?”. The answer is “NO!” since COS is a far superior solution. Instead of simply asking “What did we do?” Clinical Outcomes Analytics (COS) responds: “How effective was it and what should we change?”
For instance, a report might show that 100 patients received chemotherapy. A Clinical Outcomes Solution will reveal how many of them had positive treatment results, what side effects occurred, how their quality of life was impacted, and whether it makes sense to adjust the treatment protocol. In other words, COS goes beyond protocols and basic paperwork. These systems genuinely help you become better.
Want a tailored application that perfectly suits your clinic? Contact the Corpsoft Solutions team, so we can create an ultimate solution for you!
What Problems Can Clinical Outcomes Solutions (COS) Solve for You?
Healthcare facilities currently collect gigabytes of data, but it doesn’t always translate into valuable insights for decision-making. That’s why you need a clinical outcomes assessment solution to help you.
No matter whether you have a small estheticians’ office or a large medical network, these tools help you to view treatment outcomes simultaneously through the eyes of the patient, the analyst, and the management. It will improve your efficiency in the long run, while simplifying the day-to-day workflow of your team.
Subjective Evaluation of Treatment Results
It’s a common situation when doctors often assess treatment effectiveness subjectively, based on their impressions or brief patient visits. COS helps by:
- Providing quantitative outcome measures (pain levels, physical activity, quality of life).
- Collecting patient feedback via surveys and apps.
- Creating dynamic charts visible to doctors and clinic management.
For example, a patient complains of persistent fatigue after treatment. Without COS, this might go unnoticed. Meanwhile, clinical outcome measurement records this consequence of the doctor’s current treatment and signals for additional intervention.
Lack of Connection Between Treatment Outcomes and Therapy Decisions
In many clinics, decisions about changing therapy are made “by eye” without clear linkage to how the patient actually responds to treatment. Meanwhile, patient outcomes solutions:
- Tracks treatment history alongside outcomes (e.g., decreasing effectiveness after the 3rd chemotherapy cycle).
- Provides recommendations or alerts based on data patterns.
- Alerts the physician when it’s time to reconsider the treatment approach.
Using a Clinical Outcomes Solution, the clinic tracks each patient’s treatment history alongside objective outcome data collected via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). For instance, after the third chemotherapy cycle, the system detects a consistent pattern: it takes longer for patients with specific comorbidities to heal, and they may have increased side effects like severe fatigue or nausea.
The COS automatically generates alerts for the oncology team, recommending that they review the current therapy protocol for these patients. As a result, your doctors can timely adjust the treatment before patients even face complications.
Challenges in Evidence-Based Implementation of New Protocols
Introducing new treatment protocols can be challenging since you need to analyze and overcome every possible risk of such implementation. Without these, medical leaders cannot defend innovations to regulatory bodies or insurers. Clinical effectiveness data solutions support this by:
- Delivering structured data for “before and after” comparisons.
- Helping collect clinical evidence locally, within the specific clinic.
- Facilitating faster adoption of new methods without compromising patient safety.
For example, a clinic wants to replace a classic stroke treatment protocol with a more modern, less invasive one. Using COS, it tracks the effectiveness of the new approach in the first 50 patients and obtains data to present results to management or governmental agencies.
Top 5 Clinical Outcomes Solutions Transforming Patient Care
Just 10 years ago, most medical documentation was actual paper documents. It occupies a lot of physical space, regularly gets lost, and is damaged. So, more and more institutions decided to implement enterprise-wide digital solutions. We’ve analyzed five of the most influential examples of outcome measures in healthcare to show you the true power of these tools.
| Solution | Integration with EHR / Systems | Metrics Tracked | Support Level | Scalability & Typical Use Cases |
| Health Catalyst – Outcomes Improvement Suite | Late-binding data warehouse, real-time dashboards, alerts | Clinical outcomes, process metrics, population health | Dedicated analytics CoE setup, shared-risk partnerships | Enterprise health systems, network-wide protocol standardization |
| Epic Healthy Planet | Native to Epic EHR, care gaps dashboards, and MyChart outreach | Screening rates, chronic disease management, population-level PROs | Embedded care management tools, risk stratification | Epic-based hospitals shifting to value-based care |
| Flatiron Health RWE Platform | Oncology EMR + genomic data, FDA-linked datasets | Real-world progression, survival, treatment patterns | Research & regulatory support, machine learning curation | Oncology research networks, pharma, and HTA bodies |
| PROMIS (NIH) | Embed-ready PRO forms in EHR, mobile apps | Pain, fatigue, anxiety, function, sleep, 70+ domains | Item-bank adaptive testing, national norms | Clinics integrating patient-reported outcomes into chronic care & rehab |
| Medisolv ENCOR eCQM Suite | QRDA/API data ingestion from EHR, CMS-compliant | eCQMs, PRO-PMs, MIPS & ACO metrics | 24/7 support, regulatory updates | CMS quality program participants with small analytics teams |
As you see, Health Catalyst and Epic Healthy Planet offer tight and workflow-native integration, which is critical for large hospital networks. Meanwhile, PROMIS and Flatiron focus on specialized data sources (PROs and oncology RWD, respectively), and Medisolv ensures CMS-ready compliance with minimal IT overhead.
Enterprise solutions (Health Catalyst, Epic Healthy Planet) excel in multi-site rollouts, while PROMIS and Flatiron cater to deep-specialty needs. Medisolv is ideal for smaller clinics needing compliance without building large analytics teams.
Epic Healthy Planet is built right into the clinical panel to notify staff or patients in real time.
Flatiron operates at the scale of real-world evidence (RWE), supporting validation and development of local guidelines and treatment protocols. PROMIS patient interfaces can be deployed in patient portals or clinic tablets, with data instantly recorded as PRO measures.
Ready to implement a solution that improves clinical outcomes in your practice or healthcare organization? The Corpsoft Solutions team will select the optimal platform for your clinical goals, digital maturity level, and budget.
How to Choose the Right Clinical Outcomes Solution for Your Clinic
Selecting the right platform is tricky, but absolutely doable. You’ll need to go beyond picking a “cool brand” or assuming that “the most expensive tool must be the best one.” Your goal is to choose a solution that fits your clinical tasks, technical infrastructure, and ability to evolve alongside your organization’s growth.
Examine Your Facility Type
If you have a specialty private clinic, such as orthopedic or endocrinology centers, evidence-based solutions can help you by enabling a quick launch without major customization of templates or data collection logic.
Large multi-specialty hospitals or clinic networks should look at scalable enterprise solutions. You need to ensure vertical (across clinical areas) and horizontal (across sites) scalability. Platforms like Health Catalyst or Epic Healthy Planet have proven their value in large hospital systems.
Regional or public healthcare providers often face stricter requirements for compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 27001. For them, certified solutions with localized support and adaptability for public-sector regulations are a must.
Digital maturity level
Another thing to evaluate is the digital maturity level of your clinic. If you already have an EHR, Laboratory Information System (LIS), or PACS, the Clinical Outcomes Solution should integrate seamlessly. It would be perfect if the hosen tool uses open APIs or HL7/FHIR standards.
But if your facility still doesn’t have a full-fledged EHR and only uses a basic electronic patient card, you don’t need to implement complex solutions. Implement a basic minimum viable product (MVP) while ensuring gradual integration with more advanced EHRs that you may decide to use in the future.
Integration capabilities
Clinical effectiveness data solutions need to have as much user data as possible, so the tool will have enough information to analyze. So, you need to ensure that your future platform supports HL7 or FHIR REST APIs, as well as adapters for specific interoperability models like SMART on FHIR, SNOMED-CT, or LOINC. If you use systems like Unity, Cerner, or Medesk, confirm whether ready-made integration modules exist.
Also consider whether the solution offers middleware, which is a data transformation layer that standardizes data structures. This is essential if you plan to use your data for research, publications, or registry participation (e.g., CDASH/SDTM compatibility).
Analytics that deliver results
Best-in-class solutions come with pre-built metrics, from eCQMs and patient-reported outcomes (PROs/PROMs) to staff workload, complication risk, etc. To ensure that the tool will scale with you, ensure that it will allow you to customize it, from building your own PRO questionnaires to adding clinic-specific KPIs and embedding them into treatment protocols.
Security first
Any digital health platform processes tons of sensitive information. Now it’s mandatory to implement the latest security measures. Ensure that your new platform supports:
- Encryption at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.2+) to protect data from interception and unauthorized access.
- Comprehensive access auditing to track who accessed what data and when, ensuring accountability.
- Role-based access control (RBAC) that restricts user permissions strictly according to their role, minimizing exposure of sensitive data.
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for users accessing the system adds an extra protection against unauthorized logins.
- Regular security assessments are conducted by third parties to identify and fix vulnerabilities proactively.
- Data backup and disaster recovery plans to ensure data integrity in case of a cyberattack or system failure.
- Compliance certifications and audits, such as ISO 27001, HITRUST, or SOC 2, demonstrate the vendor’s commitment to industry security standards.
Your tool should also have transparent and strict privacy policies that clearly explain how you collect, store, use, and share patient data and comply with local regulations such as HIPAA, GDPR, etc.
Want to ensure that your platform will always stay compliant with the latest regulations? Collaborate with experienced teams, like Corpsoft Solution, who are keeping abreast of global and local healthcare and IT laws.
Don’t ignore the human factor
If your team refuses to use the service, why did you even start the development? So, you must develop a functional and user-friendly tool that your team will use daily. The interface must be intuitive for both clinicians and patients, allowing form completion or review in under 2-3 minutes.
Questions to Ask Your Developer
Every medical organization has its own unique workflows, compliance requirements, and patient population needs. This is why simply buying an “off-the-shelf” solution is rarely the best option.
For some clinics, such tools are overkill, packed with unnecessary features that drive up cost and complexity. For others, they’re too limited, missing critical functionality for day-to-day operations. That’s why it’s often smarter to work with a development team that can either:
- Build a fully custom solution from scratch, or
- Create a hybrid model that combines the speed and proven stability of a ready-made platform with the flexibility of custom development.
Before signing anything, you need to ask the developer team a long list of questions. To save you time, we’ve already collected them and good answers to potential queries in the comprehensive table.
| Question | What a Good Answer Looks Like |
| Which data exchange standards do you support? | HL7 v2/v3, FHIR R4, SMART-on-FHIR; full API documentation; prior EHR integration experience |
| Can we add our own PRO questionnaires (in Ukrainian/Russian/English/Turkish)? | Yes, without heavy programming, with the ability to set frequency/timing |
| What metrics are available “out of the box”? | Intervention metrics (e.g., sepsis alerts), PRO measures (PROMIS, SF-36), ACO/CMS indicators |
| How is customization/localization handled? | Internal configuration model allowing in-house template setup and edits |
| What’s your evidence base? | Case studies, hospital references, RWE analyses, peer-reviewed publications |
| What’s the implementation plan, and when do we see ROI? | Structured plan: audit → pilot → full rollout → 6–12-month results review |
| Is the license clinic-specific? | Includes hosting/servers, SLA support, and updates without extra charges |
| What about cybersecurity? | Key encryption, SOC 2 Type II compliance, regular penetration testing |
| How long to launch for a clinic of our size? | ⏱ Private clinic — 4–6 weeks for MVP; network — 3–6 months |
| Are there ready integrations with our local billing/LIS/ERP? | Yes, via HL7, CSV-ETL, or API; with local adapters for Ukraine |
| What level of support is available 24/7? | Online chat, SLA, Ukrainian-language support, local partner presence |
| Can we choose return-to-cloud or self-hosting? | Yes, to comply with local data laws (e.g., Kyiv/EU/MoH certifications) |
Wrapping Up
Choosing the best outcomes health information solutions shouldn’t be a decision made by only executives or admins. To ensure the best results, you need feedback from your actual stakeholders, such as doctors, nurses, department heads, and analysts.
Form a small working group that helps you define priorities in speed, quality data, analytics, or integration with existing systems. Before going full-scale, run a proof-of-concept on a limited scope. This will show how the platform works “in the field” rather than just in a demo, and whether the metrics are relevant for your patient population.
Later, ensure the clinical outcome assessment solution fits seamlessly into daily workflows. However, don’t rush to implement it into the workflow. Monitor the impact after a few weeks, and ask yourself whether patient pain or quality-of-life scores are improving. If everything turns out fine, you can slowly roll out the tool to all departments.
Want to implement a solution to improve clinical outcomes but don’t know where to start? The Corpsoft Solutions team will help you choose the perfect platform tailored to your clinic’s needs and scale.
Subscribe to our blog